Sunday, January 26, 2025

Golden Age Of America

 

                                         Welcome To The Golden Age Of America

        I've thought a whole very lot about this statement.

       It is a bold thesis statement.

       Usually such statements are followed by three points that directly support the statement, and explain two glaring questions: why now is not the golden age and describe when the golden age was.

        The real issues, the deeply serious issues in this country that impact its people are the disgusting greed that has driven up insurance costs and the cost of prescriptions which has created a health care crisis, the greedy increase in housing costs which has created a housing crisis and the fact that I still do not have a pony. 

        Three points. Easy.

        Instead, he rolled back equal rights which will impact all Americans except for CIS white males, and began mass deportations, which have frightened all the harvest workers into hiding. The result of this will be felt when our grocery prices increase. Cause and effect.  Consequences for your actions. He will call it an "unintended" consequence. 

        I'm a theatre kid, and I can see that without a degree in economics.

        Killing DEI will turn Americans against one another, allowing prejudice to call the shots in the hiring process. This will impact Americans who are already barely holding on to their homes, apartments and lives in their underpaid jobs, contributing to the homeless and housing crisis simultaneously.

        So, from my observation, white men have all of the jobs, but nothing gets harvested so we have to import food causing grocery prices to rise astronomically for people who also cannot afford their prescriptions and health care. The rest of Americans who are not CIS white males will be relegated to serf type jobs for pennies, causing them to live in communes to afford food and shelter.

        The Golden Age is rich white guys living it up while stomping on, using up, abusing and tossing aside every other American.

        This sounds very much like French before the revolution.

        Tell me I'm wrong.

DEI

 

        I just read a great article by a woman who wrote and tracked the government change in Turkey over ten years, and it weirdly brought me hope.

        She begins by asserting that the US will not collapse in four years. There are too many local government policies as well as ornery independent business owners for the collapse of democracy and rise of a dictatorship to happen that fast.

        However, her premise depends on Americans holding on, going deep into their communities and not giving up.

        This is where I became concerned.

        Already I've spoken to people who are exhausted by the waterfall of rescinded  rights and declarations of mass exporttions.

        As of today, 26 January, 538 arrests have been made nationwide.

        While this is double the usual number, it is not as alarming as the thousands promised on his first day in office.

        Already stories have surfaced of schools refusing entry to government officials. In this case in Chicago, it may have been a case of mistaken identity---the secret service claims it was them, not ICE at the building---but they were not allowed in and left.  ICE says it wasn't them, the Secret Service says it was Secret Service and the school mistook the ID's...when "Homeland Security" is on BOTH badges guys, the average American is not going to read the fine print.

        When ICE arrives in any school, they're going to have problems. First---go find a criminal, leave the kids alone. And Second---leave the kids alone. The suggestion is they would target an elementary because parents must arrive to get the kids home. Nice idea, but buses are a thing, and parents can easily have neighbors or other classmates' parents give their student a ride if they are not using the bus.

        DPS has  been vigilant in pushing out information in the "immigration tool kit" to all parents, students and teachers. The district's policies and student rights are clearly stated and communicated freely. Ours is one of two districts in Colorado stepping up in this way. Sadly, my old district (unnamed because you know) has chosen to remain silent and tell staff to "defer to admin". I'm saying, if ICE is in the office, admin is right there. However, based on my experience in A Building in That District, admin will either hide or happily comply by turning over kids. I wish I felt differently.

         Let's switch to rolling back DEI. As a female, I've likely been a DEI hire and I have something to say. DEI policies exist as legislation because people cannot behave in a fair and equitable manner. Businesses were not hiring outside of CIS white men, and were openly discriminatory. When it became clear that most of the population needed jobs, and could not find any due to this ridiculous Frat Boy Policy, equal rights had to be codified.

        Because white male humans are not, by nature, equitable.

        With the striking of DEI and Trump telling federal workers who are DEI hires to "find another job", we have a few problems.

        First, he's firing them because they were DEI hires. He did this after he essentially outlawed hiring these people by striking DEI policy. Where would he like them to find other jobs?

        Secondly, striking this policy has given bullies free reign to discriminate in any way they feel in their hiring and firing practices. This opens the door for more bullying when folks can't find jobs and lose their homes. These Neanderthals will celebrate the reigniting of the worst years in our country's existence and will happily don their pointy white hoods and begin again. 

        It will take no time--once they've ripped through immigrants, black folks, and LGBTQ ---to come after women. They think they "fixed it" by shifting abortion laws back to the states, but that only empowered the states on the right side of that choice to fight harder, while those on the wrong side weep and wonder why babies are being abandoned at an alarming rate in their cities. 

        Then it'll be our turn. They're poised to start with anyone declared "elderly", the swipe at that age group with cutting social security is the first strike. Then it'll be ageism, doing more than softly pushing us out of our jobs and becoming more deliberate, emboldened by their Felon Leader, and firing people without cause. 

        Then our daughters will struggle to get hired, since there is no DEI or any laws to see that they are treated equitably, they will be not be employable. And then, the Big Move, when all women are stripped of rights and the ability to work, we'll be told to go back to the kitchen and stay there, pregnant and silent.

        And that is where I've stopped breathing...and lost hope.

        The article swears he cannot do all of this in four years.

        But he's already campaigning for Dictator, so the four year limit brings little hope.

CityWide DPS Snap Shots

 

                                                            24 Jan 2025

          In this dark week, I am determined to do two things: walk more than usual (working toward 10k a day), and write a positive blog.

          So here we go.

          I have not walked 10k steps this week, made it to 8k Weds. So have failed at the 10k goal, but am "taking more steps a day than you normally do." My average is 5,538 a day.  I was averaging 3K in November, so go me. Failed but not failed.

          I took seven students to DPS CityWide, which is ...hold please, eavesdropping on Northfield Theatre. Who has a FT TD, FT teacher, PT teacher and student teacher but no theatre building, they work in a cafetorium...OK, so CityWide  is this cool thing DPS does because they support PA. And this year it's devised work, which is my jam, and performed like Too Much Light...which is also my jam.

          I have been at Kennedy for three weeks. In that time, I have "tattled" on their concept of "Peer to Peer" or "Unified" theatre and PE. It is not being executed correctly. So I told.

          I arrived at the DCPA with my seven students....hold on there friend, please note by previous paragraph. I've been in this building with students for only three weeks and I managed to get seven students to attend CityWide Theatre Fest at the DCTC. More on that later. The point of this first mention is that, in my tattling to the curriculum admin at DPS, I reconnected with  a guy who is a playwright and works for DCPA and did workshops for us at APS.  Turns out he knows how to create for Sped AND the curriculum admin has money to pay him to come work with me in my class. So he's coming next Friday!

         Go Tattle Tale!

         Also meeting all these cool DPS theatre teachers, admin who are stupid super supportive of theatre. Like...what? Really? What planet am I on?

        Super. Supportive.

        Northfield is doing Hadesdtown full on in their cafetorium that they share with DSST.

        Of course there's still no money for a TD in the building but...

        Listening to them share ideas about how to communicate in so many other  languages. "Cheat out" in Kurdish means "Cheater".  "Proscenium" means "sidewalk" in another language. Love this. 

        Photo of seven kids from Kennedy and a scary old gnome woman weirdly crouching behind them, why am I crouching?



Monday, January 20, 2025

Racism, Entitlement, Parenting or Fair and Equitable Consequences---Who's The Boss? OR This Is Why Education Is Failing Part 1

 

                                                  

    These informal stories, from four buildings in three districts and all in one state.  All "just the facts".     

                                                The Facts of Building "L"

          High School Boy A, last name of Spanish origin, sprayed baby oil in the hallways as a "Senior Prank". His consequences, handed down from the principal: he had to help the custodians clean up after school for two weeks. And-since the building had the district football field, building L hosted all three graduation ceremonies- he had to help set up and strike all three ceremonies. If he did not comply, he was told he would not be allowed to walk at graduation.

        The Same Week- High School Boy B, last name not of Spanish origin, and enrolled in IB, came to school drunk with a cadre of classmates. His consequences, negotiated after his dad visited the school: He had to promise to attend alcohol awareness classes. No ISS, no suspension and no hard labor. He was not only allowed to walk at graduation, but as class president he was allowed to speak at graduation. In addition, he was allowed in the building for his IB exams. His in school consequence was that he had to write an apology note to teachers. 

        He had no real consequences in the building. 

        He was not threatened with not walking at graduation if he didn't take out the trash or help with the heavy lifting and  sett up of risers and hauling large flower pots. He just wrote a vague, insincere letter stating he was "Sorry to disappoint my teachers". 

    Student A was working a job after school to help his family, from which he had to take time off to fulfill the consequences handed down to him. He did it because graduating from high school was important to his family, and his mother was ashamed that he had "messed up" by spraying baby oil in the hall. He worked his consequences off with determination and a sense that he "had it coming". He did not whine, or complain. He had the importance of education deeply instilled in him, and even though he knew his punishment  was inequitable, he did his time quietly. Teachers, seeing his dedication, wrote emails and scheduled meetings with  the principal and the district to address this inequity. They talked directly to the student about what was actually happening. They were impressed by his resolve and positive outlook. He didn't ask for anyone to do anything for him. Actions have consequences. His mom taught him that.

    Student B was already accepted to several colleges, had received scholarships and did not need to work. He appeared confident walking the building after the incident, and worked hard at increasing his charm to make up for the bad feelings that he had created. His apology letter was thrown out by several teachers. Rumor had it he was whining about having to take alcohol awareness classes, and how the teachers were all being "rude" to him. He felt the punishment was too harsh for the crime, as his friends were "more drunk that I was".  

      Student A made a typical dumb teenage mistake by squirting baby oil on slippery tiles, but he broke no laws.

        Student B  made a teenage mistake  and broke the law by being underage and drinking, and violated the contract in the student conduct handbook by stepping onto school property under the influence.

        These were not equitable consequences.

                                                            The Response

        To say the teachers were thrown into an angry assemblage of  humans is an understatement. Educators had worked tirelessly to create equity and inclusiveness in their classrooms, only to have the entitled principal eviscerate their work back to an inequitable baseline so "angry assemblage" is a wordy understatement. They were pissed.

        They contacted the district, the union, they even reached out to news agencies. Nobody. Cared.

         Nobody cared until a lone, frustrated teacher wrote a blog about it, and that teacher became a target for an entitled  principal who was incensed that a teacher would talk about what was going on in the building to people outside the building.

        This IS Not OK.

        And even six years ago, in a suburban school, it was  allowed to happen.

                                                                Scene

                                        In Another Building, Call It Building "A"

          The building was in Turn Around. This means the state has put them on Double Secret Probation for a variety of issues, including but not limited to ,low graduation numbers.

           The principal, who learned his skills from his previous principal, chose the following strategy: increase graduation numbers by falsifying the number of students completing credit recovery. Just pass them whether they passed or not.

            First, said principal must get all admin on board. What happened in that meeting is between administrators but the result was "all admin was on board".

            Many teachers openly opposed this fraudulent approach. In best "Mob" fashion, they were bullied into silence.

            When it became clear that he could bully the staff, all afraid of losing their jobs/homes/retirement, he took it a step further. The principal threatened teachers who would not change current grades, allowing students who had never been to class to pass the class and graduate.

            All teachers grieved in writing and in person, to the union and HR, to no avail. Finally, word came through the grapevine that someone on the outside had gotten wind and the principal was about to "go down" for his corrupt behavior. He quit just months ahead of the investigation. 

                                                                The Impact

           That principal of building A left town, and became a principal in Texas. His mentor, the principal who had taught him to cheat, became superintendent of a large school district in the same state. This is the general district approach to these administrative indiscretions: move the perpetrator up to a district job and pay them more. The bullying AP  also stayed in education, and less than ten years later emerged as the Principial of Building L. He changed districts and left building A off of his resume. 

                                                            Parents (Buckle Up)

        It has become almost a sport to bash education. For a minute during Covid teachers were hailed as infallible, and universally accepted as underpaid "heroes". By September of 2021, when the Tik Tok challenge hit our buildings and students ripped apart bathrooms---we were vilified as inept at  managing classroom behavior. 

        I'm going to publicly say that if your kid comes to school and rips the sink out of the restroom, that is a parenting  problem that has become an education problem. That is not an education problem See the difference?

        Students do not study at home, even when given a free Chromebook.

        Students arrive at school hungry and dysregulated, so teachers provide free breakfast,  free lunch, social workers, kind teachers and counselors. All who do this do so without thanks, without recognition and many times, with their own money (snacks and additional food that we keep for kids in their classrooms).

                                                                Building A

 Students fail classes because they do not have instilled in them at home the value of education. So building resources are wasted chasing them around the building as they try to hide in various locations, vape in the bathrooms, sneak into the theatre, break into the art studios. Teachers are the assholes for telling them to get to class. "You don't gotta be mean about it," is the common response to "Go to class". A second favorite response is "That's racist". This sounds very much like respect has not been taught at home. Neither has listening to teachers, respecting adults or taking responsibility for their own actions. If they would just go to class and respectfully receive what there is to learn, they could learn the correct definition of "racism".

                                                                Building L  

Students have been taught at home that their privilege precludes the judgment of a teacher's grade. If they do not like their grade, they invoke the wrath of their parent. Teachers who do not acquiesce will be pressured by admin or sports coaches, whichever the parent contacted.  Teachers develop PTSD and commonly flinch when forced to deal with this issue, which should NOT be an issue. The grade is the grade, you earned the grade. Scene. That's just core classes, I have too much PTSD to approach Performing Arts. This behavior was taught at home. 

                                                        A Middle School Interlude

                                        Building N, in the same district as Building A.

            Five teachers quit between August and December in building N in the fall of 2024.

            Students argue with teachers and support staff when it's time to go to class. They will openly run away and hide to avoid going to class. They expect the teacher to alter the content when they get "bored", and protest when given a "0" for an assignment they did not turn in. When emotions are too much for them to handle, they will flip a table in the classroom and stand, defiant against any adult who suggests that their behavior is inappropriate. 

            Students openly and alternately scream or ignore teachers and support staff when confronted with their behaviors. It's pretty impressive to watch a seventh grader stare directly at an adult and refuse to speak, or move, or blink, or in any way acknowledge that someone is speaking to them. This happens regularly when students are asked to surrender their phones, which they know are not allowed in class and they have been asked to put the phone in the phone cubby at the front of the classroom every class period since school began in August. It is not October and they are still trying to hide or sneak in the phone, and then play statue because they know teachers cannot reach out and take the phone from them. It's like begging the chihuahua to spit out the stuffed animal that they've liberated and will not return to their human.

            A student stole the building keys from a teacher. This student was known to admin and has never really attended any classes, and even though CPS are involved, nothing has moved forward yet. So the building is in a holding pattern waiting for someone to take responsibility for this feral child. When the student was caught on camera with the keys and admin called home, the parent said it was impossible, admin was lying. Admin had to call the local police, show them the video, and have them conference call the parent, who remained defiant until the police said "Bring back the keys or we press charges."

            This is not an "education is failing" problem. Teaching content under these conditions is impossible and the kids aren't being held accountable at home or school due to parent interference. So. Come walk in our shoes and language arts to a feral wolverine, and then tell us it's our fault the wolverine can't stop screaming and biting long enough to learn how to spell.

                                                                     End Part 1

      

  


  

Friday, January 3, 2025

Teaching Salaries

     

            Nobody is required to read anything that I write. That's the beauty of freedom.

           I have recently changed districts for my mental health. I overstayed in my previous district due to monetary issues-primarily that I was being paid very well. I know, but for teaching trust me: it was good money. Good money, my bills were paid and I was angry, anxiety ridden, frustrated and moments away from a medical event. 

           Last year I realized I had traded my sense of self, my mental stability and my integrity for the all mighty dollar, and decided to exit. Some how. Some way.  I formulated a plan, but first, a lesson for the non teachers reading this. This is how you start planning to exit teaching.

           Retirement from teaching is not a lesson you are taught when you become a teacher. Both lessons that I am recording here, I wish I had known before I ever embarked on this career.

           Upon retirement after 21 years, you are only eligible for 51% of your salary. At 35 years, you can only receive 87.5% of your salary. You cannot receive 100% of your salary after any number of years.

          Your salary years in PERA are your actual years teaching, but your pay is attached to your district. Now if you spend 35 years in one building, then you will be at far right end of the grid at top salary and you will retire at 87.5% of that salary. But, if you left your district at year 18, you did not receive a salary that is 18 years in your new district. Depending on the new district, you will receive anywhere from eight to eleven of your 18 hard earned years. Are you still with me?  THUS and such, if you spend three years in your new district and decide to  retire at year 21 and 51% of your salary, you are NOT retiring at year 21 on the Pera pay  scale, which does not exist. You are retiring at year 13 on the salary pay scale. 

        If you change districts after year ten of teaching, you will not retire with the benefits owed for your full number of years that you taught. How is this fair? It is not. They are "golden handcuffs", forcing teachers to remain in a district for their entire career. Here is another grievance for another day, but education has changed dramatically, and due to the turnover of principals it is difficult for teachers to remain in one building for 30 years.

        So, the numbers I am using to demonstrate are NOT real numbers, but the gaps are similar. Let's say you switched districts and are in YEAR 21 across two districts according to PERA. But your new district only gave you eight years when you changed over at year 18. So on the district pay scale---which is your salary and what you will retire at 51% of---you make $70,000 a year. For comparison, your salary in this district for your actual years of 21 would be $80,000 a year, which you do not make, because the district ignored the first 16 years of your career. But you make $10k less because Colorado districts do not honor your full 21 years.

        By comparison, if you are in a district that is "higher paid" even with the cut in years and district change, the same thing will happen: they will only give you X number of years. Adding insult to injury, they are a lower paid district. Again, NOT REAL NUMBERS but as example:  you're making $70K at District A where you worked for 18 years. You switch to District J who is notoriously the lowest paid district, and they agree to give you eight (you heard me) of your 18 years. This puts you at year eight and $55K a year on the salary schedule. You have just taken a $15K a year pay cut. As a 21 year public school veteran. Don't you feel respected, valued and empowered?

        The numbers aren't real, but the gaps are my friends. Sometimes worse, depending on the district. 

        Anyone else in a career that deliberately punishes you when you want to change locations? Not even JOBS, just LOCATION. This career also offers double indemnity as you are UNhireable after age 50, AND there is a district here that will non renew teachers after their third year to avoid them receiving teacher status. Which means these people can't get hired again in the same district. This appears to be to avoid paying teachers. If they stay, you have to increase their salaries, but if you keep non renewing them, you'll have a constant staff of people who are making the bare minimum of first year teachers. 

        In my personal experience in three districts, this above strategy also ensures that your teachers are younger than your admin---which has become a frightening trend. Principals are young and threatened by veteran teachers-largely because their "Grand New Plan" was already tried and failed and they don't want to hear about it from someone who is going to A) warn them it will not work and B) sigh heavily when it fails. But that's a different grievance. Today is simply a salary lesson.

        I worked with people who were miserable, but sticking it out so they could get the most money possible in retirement. They'd still have to work somewhere after they retire. We retire from teaching, not from work.

        But again, that's another grievance.

        Thank you for attending today's civics lesson. I appreciate you.