Nobody is required to read anything that I write. That's the beauty of freedom.
I have recently changed districts for my mental health. I overstayed in my previous district due to monetary issues-primarily that I was being paid very well. I know, but for teaching trust me: it was good money. Good money, my bills were paid and I was angry, anxiety ridden, frustrated and moments away from a medical event.
Last year I realized I had traded my sense of self, my mental stability and my integrity for the all mighty dollar, and decided to exit. Some how. Some way. I formulated a plan, but first, a lesson for the non teachers reading this. This is how you start planning to exit teaching.
Retirement from teaching is not a lesson you are taught when you become a teacher. Both lessons that I am recording here, I wish I had known before I ever embarked on this career.
Upon retirement after 21 years, you are only eligible for 51% of your salary. At 35 years, you can only receive 87.5% of your salary. You cannot receive 100% of your salary after any number of years.
Your salary years in PERA are your actual years teaching, but your pay is attached to your district. Now if you spend 35 years in one building, then you will be at far right end of the grid at top salary and you will retire at 87.5% of that salary. But, if you left your district at year 18, you did not receive a salary that is 18 years in your new district. Depending on the new district, you will receive anywhere from eight to eleven of your 18 hard earned years. Are you still with me? THUS and such, if you spend three years in your new district and decide to retire at year 21 and 51% of your salary, you are NOT retiring at year 21 on the Pera pay scale, which does not exist. You are retiring at year 13 on the salary pay scale.
If you change districts after year ten of teaching, you will not retire with the benefits owed for your full number of years that you taught. How is this fair? It is not. They are "golden handcuffs", forcing teachers to remain in a district for their entire career. Here is another grievance for another day, but education has changed dramatically, and due to the turnover of principals it is difficult for teachers to remain in one building for 30 years.
So, the numbers I am using to demonstrate are NOT real numbers, but the gaps are similar. Let's say you switched districts and are in YEAR 21 across two districts according to PERA. But your new district only gave you eight years when you changed over at year 18. So on the district pay scale---which is your salary and what you will retire at 51% of---you make $70,000 a year. For comparison, your salary in this district for your actual years of 21 would be $80,000 a year, which you do not make, because the district ignored the first 16 years of your career. But you make $10k less because Colorado districts do not honor your full 21 years.
By comparison, if you are in a district that is "higher paid" even with the cut in years and district change, the same thing will happen: they will only give you X number of years. Adding insult to injury, they are a lower paid district. Again, NOT REAL NUMBERS but as example: you're making $70K at District A where you worked for 18 years. You switch to District J who is notoriously the lowest paid district, and they agree to give you eight (you heard me) of your 18 years. This puts you at year eight and $55K a year on the salary schedule. You have just taken a $15K a year pay cut. As a 21 year public school veteran. Don't you feel respected, valued and empowered?
The numbers aren't real, but the gaps are my friends. Sometimes worse, depending on the district.
Anyone else in a career that deliberately punishes you when you want to change locations? Not even JOBS, just LOCATION. This career also offers double indemnity as you are UNhireable after age 50, AND there is a district here that will non renew teachers after their third year to avoid them receiving teacher status. Which means these people can't get hired again in the same district. This appears to be to avoid paying teachers. If they stay, you have to increase their salaries, but if you keep non renewing them, you'll have a constant staff of people who are making the bare minimum of first year teachers.
In my personal experience in three districts, this above strategy also ensures that your teachers are younger than your admin---which has become a frightening trend. Principals are young and threatened by veteran teachers-largely because their "Grand New Plan" was already tried and failed and they don't want to hear about it from someone who is going to A) warn them it will not work and B) sigh heavily when it fails. But that's a different grievance. Today is simply a salary lesson.
I worked with people who were miserable, but sticking it out so they could get the most money possible in retirement. They'd still have to work somewhere after they retire. We retire from teaching, not from work.
But again, that's another grievance.
Thank you for attending today's civics lesson. I appreciate you.